Victim’s violent past cited as Brooklyn self-defense case heads to Albany
According to Carl Watson’s account, the rival livery cab driver he shot dead in 2007 was a violent bully who was approaching his car in a threatening fashion and reaching toward his waist, where he was known to carry a gun.
A Brooklyn jury rejected Watson’s self-defense claim, convicting him of manslaughter for killing Livingston Powell. Now New York’s highest court is considering whether Watson should have been allowed to introduce more evidence of Powell’s troubled past, including crimes Watson didn’t specifically know about, to justify shooting the unarmed man.
The Court of Appeals will decide whether to grant Watson a new trial and revise century-old case law meant to exclude prejudicial evidence. The court is set to hear arguments Thursday, with a decision expected a month later.