Archives
Brooklyn Public Library's
Brooklyn Daily Eagle Online™
(1841-1902)

Archives
Brooklyn Eagle™
(2003-present)

Sign In
ID is your email Password
For registration questions click here

Categories
Main page
RSS Channels
Atlantic Yards
Photo Galleries
Brooklyn Today
Brooklyn People
Brooklyn Cyclones
Courthouse News & Cases
Brooklyn SPACE
Features
Crime
Sports
Street Beat
Brooklyn Inc
Brooklyn KIDS
Editorial viewpoint
OUTBrooklyn
Brooklyn Woman
Art
Up & Coming
Hills & Gardens
Auction Advertiser
On Food
Health Care
Get A LifeStyle
On This Day in History
Obituaries
Community Boards
Stars and stripes
Community News
Local Search

Contact Us
If you'd like to contact us click here


For registration questions click here

Read about Us HERE
 
Business: Location:
 
Appliance Repair
Car Dealers
Car Repair
Carpet Cleaners
Child Care
Chiropractors
Computer Repair
Contractors
Dentists
Dry Cleaners
Electric Contractors
Golf
Hotels
Landscapers
Lawn Maintenance
Lawyers
Limousines
Locksmiths
Optometrists
Pest Control
Physician & Surgeons
Plumbers
Restaurants
Salons
Full Directory

You are not logged in. Register now. February 9, 2010

As Brooklyn Bridge Park Process Proceeds, Foes Grow More Strident
by combination of (), published online 09-16-2005
 

Dennis Holt And Trudy Whitman
School Issue Raised at Recent Community Board 6 Hearing
BROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK — A meeting to be held next Monday evening at 5 p.m. at Polytechnic University to discuss the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) on the proposal to build Brooklyn Bridge Park is not likely to be the usual detailed, orderly occasion, many observers say.

The following developments have taken place within the past several days:

• Organizations and web site addresses opposing the park are springing up everywhere. There are Friends of Brooklyn Bridge Park, the Brooklyn Bridge Park Defense Fund and an e-mail address “Save the Park @gmail.com.”

• People have been overheard in public talking on cell phones discussing strategy and tactics for opposing the park, or elements of the park plan, including one person bringing up the absence in the DEIS of the possible extension of the Clark Street subway platform for pedestrian access to the park.

• Some members of the above-mentioned groups have been talking about a lawsuit or suits whose objective is to either significantly delay or to prevent the building of the park as it is currently planned.

• The Willowtown Association, which has passed a resolution discouraging board members or others from communicating to the press on board issues (although there is no board at the moment), has encouraged others to tap into the web site of a community newspaper “which has extensively covered the criticism of [the park] Conservancy.”

• That newspaper has come under attack from a variety of community leaders for its reporting on the issue, leading one of them to say, “I, for one, am growing weary of having to clean up after this reporter’s messes.”

It is probable that unresolved park elements — noise attenuation and the design of entrances, to name two — will be advanced as reasons to delay further park development.

Many Meetings
Meetings have been the order of the day. Opponents of the park have been meeting in the Cobble Hill community room on Baltic Street; the Park Conservancy held a meeting last week with neighborhood and community organizations to bring them up to date; as this paper is going to press, the Park Development Corporation is meeting with its Community Advisory Council; and then there is the September 19 meeting.

CB 6 Session
Before a meeting of Community Board 6 this past Monday night, Roy Sloane of Community Board 6, who is also active in the Cobble Hill Association, sent an e-mail to all Association members. He said, “No one should let the developers get away with this corrupt hijacking of the taxpayers’ dollars.” A goal of that meeting, held this Monday, was to get Community Board 6 to put itself on record opposing the current park plan. Sloane even offered people prepared testimony to read into the record. However, no resolution on the park was offered, although many speakers expressed their views against the plan. Speakers included members of the Cobble Hill Association, Willowtown Association, Fort Greene Association and the Sierra Club.

One new concern raised was that the Department of Education plans no new school to accommodate families of the planned new buildings. (On that question, the DEIS finds the existing P.S. 8 and P.S. 29 underutilized and capable of absorbing the increase.)

The only public official present, City Councilman David Yassky, called the park a valuable amenity, but called the DEIS “misguided.” He suggested that the residential component should be scaled back one-third and the revenue made up from other sources.

Issue of Recreation
Supporters of the park plan are expected, among other things, to rebut opponents’ claims that the new park plan eliminates most recreational facilities found in earlier plans for the park. Plan supporters point to the inclusion of courts for basketball, volleyball and handball, as well as three playgrounds and four acres for soccer, field hockey and other sports.

© Brooklyn Daily Eagle 2005
All materials posted on brooklyneagle.com are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without written permission, which can be sought by emailing permission@brooklylneagle.net.

Main Office 718 422 7400

 



Daily Cover

Weekly Cover

Real Estate Brooklyn

Bay Ridge Eagle