Archives
Brooklyn Public Library's
Brooklyn Daily Eagle Online™
(1841-1902)

Archives
Brooklyn Eagle™
(2003-present)

Sign In
ID is your email Password
For registration questions click here

Categories
Main page
RSS Channels
Atlantic Yards
Photo Galleries
Brooklyn Today
Brooklyn People
Brooklyn Cyclones
Courthouse News & Cases
Brooklyn SPACE
Features
Crime
Sports
Street Beat
Brooklyn Inc
Brooklyn KIDS
Editorial viewpoint
OUTBrooklyn
Brooklyn Woman
Art
Up & Coming
Hills & Gardens
Auction Advertiser
On Food
Health Care
Get A LifeStyle
On This Day in History
Obituaries
Community Boards
Stars and stripes
Community News
Local Search

Contact Us
If you'd like to contact us click here


For registration questions click here

Read about Us HERE
 
Business: Location:
 
Appliance Repair
Car Dealers
Car Repair
Carpet Cleaners
Child Care
Chiropractors
Computer Repair
Contractors
Dentists
Dry Cleaners
Electric Contractors
Golf
Hotels
Landscapers
Lawn Maintenance
Lawyers
Limousines
Locksmiths
Optometrists
Pest Control
Physician & Surgeons
Plumbers
Restaurants
Salons
Full Directory

You are not logged in. Register now. February 9, 2010

Appellate Division Agrees, One Ratner Lease Is Void
by Ryan Thompson (court@brooklyneagle.net), published online 05-11-2009
 

MONROE PLACE — The Appellate Division, Second Department in Brooklyn Heights upheld a Kings County Supreme Court judge who ruled that a tenant’s lease assignment was improperly made to Forest City Ratner and therefore void.

Two years ago, Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Ira B. Harkavy ruled that developer Shayna Boymelgreen’s lease assignment to Ratner violated the terms of the original lease with the landlord, which required the landlord’s “written consent” for assignment. Boymelgreen is a tenant on a one-acre site at Pacific and Carlton streets, which sits in the Atlantic Yards footprint and is on property that Ratner seeks to control through eminent domain.

A Ratner spokesperson said that the ruling and subsequent affirmation by the Appellate Division will likely not cause any further delays to the multi-billion dollar project that has already been delayed for years by litigation in the state and federal courts, as well as the subsequent economic crisis.

But the ruling in the case 752 Pacific, LLC v. Pacific Carlton Development Corp. could cause additional legal hurdles for the litigation-plagued project that once had expected to bring the New Jersey Nets to Brooklyn as early as 2006. Lawsuits over the state’s use of eminent domain, the project’s construction timeline, and the environmental review and approval of the project are still pending.

—Ryan Thompson
Brooklyn Daily Eagle

* * *

Questions? Comments? Sound off to the Editor

————————

© Brooklyn Daily Eagle 2009 All materials posted on BrooklynEagle.com are protected by United States copyright law. Just a reminder, though -- It’s not considered polite to paste the entire story on your blog. Most blogs post a summary or the first paragraph,( 40 words) then post a link to the rest of the story. That helps increase click-throughs for everyone, and minimizes copyright issues. So please keep posting, but not the entire article. arturc at att.net

 



Daily Cover

Weekly Cover

Real Estate Brooklyn

Bay Ridge Eagle