Archives
Brooklyn Public Library's
Brooklyn Daily Eagle Online™
(1841-1902)

Archives
Brooklyn Eagle™
(2003-present)

Sign In
ID is your email Password
For registration questions click here

Categories
Main page
RSS Channels
Atlantic Yards
Photo Galleries
Brooklyn Today
Brooklyn People
Brooklyn Cyclones
Courthouse News & Cases
Brooklyn SPACE
Features
Crime
Sports
Street Beat
Brooklyn Inc
Brooklyn KIDS
Editorial viewpoint
OUTBrooklyn
Brooklyn Woman
Art
Up & Coming
Hills & Gardens
Auction Advertiser
On Food
Health Care
Get A LifeStyle
On This Day in History
Obituaries
Community Boards
Stars and stripes
Community News
Local Search

Contact Us
If you'd like to contact us click here


For registration questions click here

Read about Us HERE
 
Business: Location:
 
Appliance Repair
Car Dealers
Car Repair
Carpet Cleaners
Child Care
Chiropractors
Computer Repair
Contractors
Dentists
Dry Cleaners
Electric Contractors
Golf
Hotels
Landscapers
Lawn Maintenance
Lawyers
Limousines
Locksmiths
Optometrists
Pest Control
Physician & Surgeons
Plumbers
Restaurants
Salons
Full Directory

You are not logged in. Register now. February 9, 2010

Architecture and Discovery Bring Brooklyn House of Detention Lawsuit Back to Court
by Samuel Newhouse (sam@brooklyneagle.net), published online 06-25-2009
 

By Samuel Newhouse
Brooklyn Daily Eagle

ADAMS STREET — Opponents of the controversial Brooklyn House of Detention and city attorneys clashed yesterday in Kings County Supreme Court — arguing over the city’s proposal to pay millions for a design of a possible jail expansion.

While Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Sylvia Hinds-Radix had ordered that the Department of Correction (DOC) could reopen but not expand the jail without completing land use and environmental reviews, the city is now claiming that between $10 and $30 million must be spent on architectural plans to perform those reviews.

“We’ve accepted that if we’re going forward now, we can’t get to a place to do those reviews without a preliminary design,” city attorney Christopher King said in court yesterday. “They might disagree with how much money we’re spending, [but that is] utterly irrelevant to this case.”

Attorneys representing the Stop BHOD coalition, however, argued the opposite, saying that the city cannot undertake even preliminary design work without first performing other reviews.

One prominent jail opponent, City Councilman Bill De Blasio (D-Park Slope, Cobble Hill), criticized the city and DOC’s plan.

“In the middle of an economic crisis, Mayor [Michael] Bloomberg is throwing tens of millions of dollars out the window. It defies common sense to prematurely toss money into a project that has been halted by the courts, is completely unnecessary, and may never be built,” De Blasio said in a statement. Yesterday’s hearing took place because the city made a motion to reargue, resettle and renew the judge’s decision. The city is disputing Justice Hinds-Radix’s granting of expedited discovery to the petitioners, and is also asking for further clarification of her ruling.

Since that court decision, Justice Hinds-Radix was promoted to the chief post of Kings County Administrative Judge for Civil Matters. For more coverage of Justice Hinds-Radix, see story below. The city claims Justice Hinds-Radix’s decision needs clarification because City Comptroller Bill Thompson wrote in a March 30 letter to Mayor Bloomberg that he was rejecting the city’s original architectural services contract “based on the recent court order that prohibits the city from allocating any funds for the expansion of the Brooklyn House of Detention.”

The city said that Comptroller Thompson made it appear that Justice Hinds-Radix had enjoined spending any money on the expansion of the jail, while Justice Hinds-Radix in fact only ordered that no money be allocated toward “construction” in connection with the expansion of the jail.

Calls to Comptroller Thompson’s office for comment were not answered at press time.

Also, Justice Hinds-Radix originally granted expedited discovery, which Stop BHOD counsel Randy Mastro had said was a positive step towards exposing alleged wrongdoing in the city’s move of a handful of prisoners into the jail in November last year.

“Clearly, the city is nervous about that,” said Stop BHOD attorney Jim Walden, who works with Mastro at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

Stop BHOD requested various pieces of documentation, as well as depositions from DOC Commissioner Martin Horn and Deputy Commissioner Florence Hutner.

But the city said discovery is not necessary because there are no material facts concerning Stop BHOD’s legal claims that are in dispute.

“Petitioners’ discovery requests will only delay the resolution of this summary proceeding,” the city wrote. “The mental impressions or intentions of these officials [Horn and Hutner] are completely irrelevant to any of petitioners’ underlying SEQRA, IJLURP and Fair Share claims.”

The Stop BHOD coalition opposed reopening the 749-bed jail, located on Atlantic Avenue between Smith Street and Boerum Place, since the city’s plan to reopen and possibly expand the jail was revealed. The jail was originally built in the 1950s, but has not housed overnight prisoners for five years.

Opponents of the jail argue that it will have a negative economic impact on the community, which has seen a substantial resurgence of local businesses and property values. Smith Street has become a nightlife destination in recent years.

Opponents have also argued more broadly that city funds should be focused on institutions like schools and not on jails.

The matter was adjourned to July 9, as Hinds-Radix had not yet received Stop BHOD’s opposition papers, partly because, after her promotion, the case temporarily was assigned to a different judge. Hon. Hinds-Radix said that she will continue to preside over the matter. “I’ve worked too hard on this case,” she said.

————————

© Brooklyn Daily Eagle 2009 All materials posted on BrooklynEagle.com are protected by United States copyright law. Just a reminder, though -- It’s not considered polite to paste the entire story on your blog. Most blogs post a summary or the first paragraph,( 40 words) then post a link to the rest of the story. That helps increase click-throughs for everyone, and minimizes copyright issues. So please keep posting, but not the entire article. arturc at att.net

 



Daily Cover

Weekly Cover

Real Estate Brooklyn

Bay Ridge Eagle